|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The real advantage of organic produces may be
understood by examining the long term effects of conventional agriculture
techniques distinguishing the
*Effects on the environment (natural resources degradation: ground, water, air) *Effects on the living (risks for the genetic patrimony and diminution of the biodiversity). *Direct effect on the human being (chronic and cumulative micro pollution of ingested commodities, leading to new risks for the organism’s health and its descendants). Pesticides and chemical fertilizers are largely used by the conventional agriculture. The world synthetic fertilizer consumption was less than 7 millions tons in 1945, was more than 53 million tons in 1968, and is now more than 150 million tons a year. Fertilizers used by the conventional agriculture are very soluble and go directly down the plant, contrarily to natural fertilizers used in the organic agriculture that are first transformed in composites easily assimilated by plants. Consequently, the soil biological activity under conventional agriculture is no longer solicited and impoverish. |
| A chain reaction
is initiated by the degradation of the 3 natural environments (ground,
water, air) essential to the earth life, affecting finally all living beings.
The advanced selection of some breeds with high yields shows two risks: raising the fragility of inbreeding species, and the desertion of breeding areas, to which some breeds are not adapted to. It is difficult to evaluate the effects of conventional
agriculture and derived food products on the human being health. A
large amount of toxic agents are ingested through solid food and drinks.
These toxic agents are of a very heterogeneous
nature: mycotoxines, chemical residues used in non-organic agriculture
(pesticides and fertilizers), food additives, natural vegetable components,
products used for preparation, cooking, preserving. At this time,
there are 1500 different pesticides largely used by the conventional agriculture:
about 1.5 to 2 tons/hectare of culture/year, in Europe.
These are not harmless.
Actually, this is our way of formulating problems that should be revised: what do we know about long term cumulating and chronic effects of diffuse food’s micro pollution on the organism. Are statistic laws valid for the all population, can they be applied to the most sensitive (children, pregnant women, sick, aging persons)? For example, what is the cause of the worrying degradation of the genetic situation of the human being:Children are particularly more sensitive to lead intoxication. A close correlation between a fall behind at school and the lead rate in baby tooth does exist. The intellectual level of children born from lead-exposed mothers is significantly lower than the others. A human being needs 20 to 30 years to lose half of the ingested cadmium dose! In 1966, 574 genetic deficiencies were found and proved; 20 years later, 3 times more were detected (and about as many found but not proven). |
| The organic sector methods remain the way
that gives the consumer the best guarantee today. Agriculture
production techniques are enough elaborate to avoid pesticides and synthetic
fertilizers. The line of conduct of organic breeding techniques is
to improve the health state of herd, increase its fruitfulness and its
longevity and to take care of its well-being. This relies on simple
principles of common sense: a varied and healthy organic feeding, breeding
conditions without stress (rather than overpopulated henhouse which can
include millions of poultry, each having only few cm²), a
preventive alternative veterinarian medicine (rather than the excessive
use of antibiotics and doping products), choice
of breeds depending on local characteristics.
Colorings, synthetic flavors and flavor enhancers are forbidden, only natural flavors and other natural additives are accepted: the choice of technological auxiliaries is also strictly controlled. All in all, organic agriculture is an integrated approach over all life cycle of products (from the agriculture or breeding up to the market), based on an agriculture of high technology because of the necessity to master a large number of complex factors without destabilizing the natural balance. The organic agriculture way is to “nourish the soil to nourish the plant”, to use at best the natural resources; the conventional agriculture way is to ‘boost artificially the plant or the animal to produce more, faster’, without caring about the rhythms and natural cycles. That is why the prices of organic produces are usually between 5% and 50% more expensive than produces from intensive techniques.The organic agriculture is twice more expensive for the farmer than the conventional agriculture, even with considering the economy realized on the treatments. Added to that, the yield per hectares is usually lower (an average of about 25% shown during an experiment in Holland) (in La Recherche, supplément 227, December 1990). |